ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Stress Characteristics and Their Associations With Pain Intensity: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to understand the associations between stress intensity, characteristics that trigger a physiological stress responses (Sense of lack of control, social evaluative Threat, Unpredictability, Novelty; STUN) and the experience of momentary pain intensity and its variability among adults living with chronic low back pain.
methodsParticipants (n = 181) completed electronic diaries three times daily for 7 days that measured pain and stress intensity (Numeric Rating Scale-11) and the extent to which stressors were attributable to the STUN characteristics. Data was analysed using a Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model.
resultsA 1-point increase in between-subject (BS) stress intensity was associated with a 0.70 point (p < 0.001) increase in pain intensity. For every 1-point increase in BS and within-subject (WS) perceived lack of control, pain intensity increased respectively by 0.128 and 0.040 point (p < 0.01). A 1-point increase in WS novelty was associated with a 0.05-point decrease in pain intensity (p < 0.001). There was more homogeneity in pain scores across participants at higher levels of WS stress intensity, WS perceived lack of control (β = -0.032) and BS perceived novelty (β = -0.243) (p < 0.05). Participants' own pain intensity ratings were not more or less consistent or erratic as a function of their stress levels.
conclusionsStress intensity is associated with pain intensity and with BS variance in pain ratings. STUN characteristics were inconsistently associated with pain variance, but lack of perceived control and novelty might be associated with pain intensity. Future research should clarify the role of STUN characteristics, above stress intensity, in pain intensity and pain variability. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study advances understanding of stress-pain dynamics by applying the integrative STUN framework to chronic low back pain. Findings reveal that perceived lack of control amplifies pain, whereas novel experiences reduce it. By identifying specific stress characteristics influencing pain variability, this work highlights innovative intervention targets, emphasising the potential of fostering novelty and re-evaluating control perceptions in chronic pain management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.