Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742353›Full record

ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2026

Dealing with feelings in adolescence: Cognitive reappraisals in unpleasant and pleasant emotional events and their associations with subjective well-being.

F Sternke, S Nestler, E S Blanke, U Kunzmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F SternkeWilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Lifespan Psychology Lab, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-1854
S NestlerInstitute for Psychology, Statistics and Psychological Methods Working Unit, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-2441
E S BlankeWilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Lifespan Psychology Lab, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
U KunzmannWilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Lifespan Psychology Lab, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

German Research Foundation 451942112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of heightened exposure to both unpleasant and pleasant events, requiring effective emotion regulation. Cognitive reappraisal is particularly beneficial, yet research has typically examined its role either in unpleasant or in pleasant situations, rarely considering both simultaneously within individuals. In this 28-day daily diary study, we investigated whether cognitive reappraisal in unpleasant and pleasant events each uniquely contributes to subjective well-being, and, given cognitive maturation during adolescence, whether these associations become stronger with increasing age. A sample of 122 adolescents (15-19 years; M = 17.01, SD = 1.42) reported their end-of-day subjective well-being and the use of eight cognitive reappraisal strategies for the day's most unpleasant and most pleasant events. On a within-person level, both types of reappraisal predicted higher subjective well-being, even when simultaneously included in the model. Unexpectedly, these effects did not vary by age. On a between-person level, reappraisal in unpleasant and pleasant events was each associated with higher subjective well-being, but not when analyzed jointly, due to shared variance between both types of reappraisal. The within-person findings highlight that regulating emotions in both unpleasant and pleasant events uniquely contributes to adolescent well-being, emphasizing the importance of context on emotion regulation in adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescencedaily diarydevelopmentreappraisalsubjective well‐being

Identifiers

PMID41742353
PMCPMC12936276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.