SynthesisHealth care management review
Diversity and performance in health care: A systematic review of the evidence base.
Synthesis in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Gender Equality in Australian Healthcare Leadership: Why National Targets Matter and What It Means for Healthcare Employers.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiversity in the health care sector has been put forward as a key factor for improving organizational performance; however, the evidence based on this assumed positive impact is still fragmented. PURPOSE: Adopting a narrative and critical approach, this systematic review investigated the relationship between surface and deep-level diversity and performance in the health care sector. Performance is categorized into two main dimensions: relational performance, arising from interactions between groups of individuals within organizations, and organizational performance, which refers to outcomes related to the overall organizational activity. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This systematic review focused on scientific papers published in English in international peer-reviewed journals, retrieved from the ISI Web of Science citation and search database. In addition, citation snowballing was employed to identify further relevant studies. A total of 58 papers were identified as meeting the research criteria.
findingsThe analysis of the 58 selected studies indicates that at the organizational level, diversity has a generally positive effect on performance. At the team level, however, diversity is frequently linked with mixed or negative relational performance outcomes. Undesired consequences of diversity specifically relate to the emergence of homogeneous subgroups, so-called faultlines, in groups of individuals, ultimately leading to a negative impact on relational and organizational performance. At the board level, where the extant literature has mainly focused on gender diversity, increasing female representation appears to yield positive effects, except when it is already comparatively high. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Policymakers and practitioners should recognize both the benefits and challenges of diversity in health care. While diversity is essential in such a complex sector, it may produce unintended negative consequences, particularly when diversity is at high levels or faultlines emerge. This highlights the importance of effective management strategies and human resource policies to optimize its impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.