Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742328›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026

Advancing crisis readiness through progressive simulation in undergraduate medical education.

Rebekah Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rebekah ColeDepartment of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA. rebekah.cole@usuhs.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2628-8658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As healthcare professionals worldwide face increasing demands from disasters, mass casualty incidents, and other complex emergencies, medical education must prepare students to perform in high-pressure, resource-limited environments. Traditional simulation experiences are often episodic and narrowly focused, limiting their ability to cultivate the longitudinal development of clinical skills, leadership, and adaptability. This innovation report presents a four-year, progressive simulation curriculum designed to build crisis readiness across the undergraduate medical education continuum. Informed by experiential learning theory and cognitive load theory, this innovative model scaffolds learners through staged simulation experiences that grow in complexity and responsibility. From early roleplay with peers to immersive field exercises and capstone leadership scenarios, the simulation curriculum integrates clinical, communication, and team-based competencies in increasingly dynamic environments. This longitudinal approach aligns with principles of competency-based medical education and offers a scalable, transferable model for enhancing readiness and resilience in future physicians.

Indexed as

Disaster responseExperiential learningMedical educationProgressive simulation

Identifiers

PMID41742328
PMCPMC13041333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.