ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
The root system of Pappostipa frigida as a hotspot of active bacterial communities in the Andean steppe of the Atacama desert.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn arid ecosystems, soil microorganisms experience prolonged drought and nutrient limitation, resulting in widespread dormancy and a decoupling between microbial presence and activity. The rhizosphere is a resource-rich microenvironment where plants, inputs may alleviate these constraints and regulate microbial metabolic states. However, it remains unclear whether root system effects in extreme environments reflect taxonomic turnover or the activation of dormant soil bacteria. Here, we investigated whether the rhizosphere-surrounding soil (RSS) of Pappostipa frigida, a dominant perennial grass of the Andean steppe of the Atacama Desert, reshapes soil bacterial communities primarily by promoting the activation of dormant taxa rather than by recruiting distinct bacterial populations, and how this process influences microbial diversity, activity, and functional potential.
resultsWe employed a combination of soil physicochemical analyses, RNA/DNA metabarcoding, shotgun metagenomic sequencing and culture-based assays to compare bulk soil (BS) and RSS bacterial communities. The active bacterial community in the RSS exhibited significantly higher diversity and Shannon index than those in BS, whereas total (DNA-based) communities showed no significant differences between soil compartments. Taxonomic structure was primarily shaped by soil compartment rather than nucleic acid type, and active bacteria in the RSS showed a stronger correlation with total bacterial populations than those in the BS. Notably, 65% of putatively dormant bacterial taxa in BS were detected as active in RSS, and 75% were recoverable in culture. Additionally, 24% were members of PGP bacterial families. Functionally, the bacterial communities of the BS were enriched in sporulation genes, whereas active bacterial communities in the RSS showed higher abundances of genes associated with osmotic stress tolerance, siderophore synthesis, and resuscitation-promoting factors.
conclusionsOur results indicate that the root system of Pappostipa frigida functions as a localized hotspot of microbial activity in an extreme arid environment by promoting the activation of dormant members of the soil microbial seed bank rather than by recruiting distinct taxa. By integrating microbial activity, functional traits, and culturability, this study highlights the central role of plant-associated microenvironments in regulating microbial life-history strategies in drylands and provides a mechanistic framework for understanding plant-microbe interactions under chronic environmental stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.