ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
Application of PGCL/AP conductive composite scaffold combined with electrical stimulation in neural tissue engineering.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nerve regeneration and axonal growth can be significantly enhanced by electrical stimulation (ES) using conductive polymers. But in addition to ES, nerve cell function and how they react to substrate conductivity are also essential factors in nerve repair. As a result, ES, in conjunction with appropriate materials (such as tissue scaffolds), has been used to treat nerve damage and has demonstrated significant promise for peripheral nerve regeneration. In this work, electrospinning was used to create conductive composite scaffolds made of polyglycolic acid@polycaprolactone/aniline pentamer (PGCL/AP). We later verified that PC12 cells cultured on these scaffolds exhibited improved migration, proliferation, and vitality upon electrical stimulation. Furthermore, In the established 10-mm peripheral nerve injury model, the PAP + ES group achieved outcomes comparable to the autograft group in the assessment of functional and morphological recovery, encompassing SFI, myelination rate, and gastrocnemius muscle evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.