Observational studyNutrition journal2026
Agreement Of A 24-hour food record and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire compared with urinary biomarkers of sodium, potassium, and protein intake.
Observational study in Nutrition journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDietary assessment methods such as food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 24-hour food records (24hFRs) are widely used in population-based studies due to their feasibility and relatively low cost. However, these self-reported methods are subject to measurement errors, including recall bias and misreporting, which may vary across individuals and seasons. In contrast, 24-hour urinary excretion (24UE) of sodium, potassium, and nitrogen is considered a more objective biomarker of intake and is often used as a reference method in validation studies.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate the agreement of a 24-hour food record (24hFR) and the relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) against recovery urinary biomarkers of sodium, potassium, and urea-derived protein intake.
methodThis observational, cross-sectional validation study included a total of 37 healthy adult women aged 18–44 years. Information on participants’ sociodemographic characteristics, dietary habits, and physical activity levels was collected, and anthropometric measurements were performed by the researcher. In addition, 24-hour food records (24hFR) and 24-hour urine excretion (24UE) samples were collected twice in summer and twice in winter on nonconsecutive days with a 14-day interval, resulting in a total of four collections per participant, and food consumption frequencies (FFQs) were determined.
resultsThe most commonly used salt type among the participants was iodized table salt (56.8%). The mean sodium intake estimated from the 24-hour food record was significantly higher in the winter (3142.2 ± 905.7 mg/day) compared to the summer (2479.6 ± 793.5 mg/day) (p < 0.05). The mean sodium and potassium intakes estimated by the 24-hour food record were similar to those determined by urinary sodium and potassium excretion at the group level in both seasons, although correlations at the individual level were weak. The difference between the measurement methods for sodium and potassium values (FFQ, 24hFR, 24UE) in summer and winter was due to the frequency of food consumption. Protein intake estimated by the FFQ and food record methods was comparable; however, protein intake calculated from urinary excretion was higher than the estimated values.
conclusionIn conclusion, the 24-hour food record method, which is widely used in nutritional assessment, showed closer agreement with urinary sodium and potassium excretion at the group (mean) level rather than at the individual ranking level, but underestimated protein intake in this study. These findings highlight the need for complementary biochemical markers when assessing protein consumption in population-based dietary surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.