ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2026
Measuring marital choice as an indicator of women's marital agency in rural India.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited data on forced marriages in the context of India. This study involved validation of new measures of women’s marital choice in terms of partner selection and timing of marriage as indicators of women’s marital agency in rural India.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from N = 1192 married women aged 18–30 who participated in the Counseling Husbands and wives to Achieve Reproductive health and Marital equity (CHARM2) trial in rural Maharashtra, India. We included two novel items on women’s decision-making regarding who the married and when they married. We evaluated the construct validity of these measures by testing their associations with other traditionally gender normative practices related to marriage including girl child marriage, purdah, and dowry using Fisher’s exact test. We then conducted crude and adjusted regression models to determine associations between our marital choice variables and indicators of current marital agency, specifically recent intimate partner violence, marital quality, and contraceptive self-efficacy.
results15.5% of women reported they were the primary decision-maker on marital partner selection and 9.4% reported they were the primary decision-maker on marital timing. Both measures were highly corelated to each other (r = 0.8) and with reports of arranged marriage (with partner choice r = 0.9; with marriage timing r = 0.6). Having choice over marriage partner and timing were equally inversely correlated with child marriage (r = -0.3, respectively) and equally and positively correlated with not receiving a dowry (r = 0.4, respectively). Both choice variables were negatively correlated with the practice of purdah (r = -0.3 and − 0.1). Our marital choice variables were not associated with any agency in marriage dependent variables, except for choice of partner and marital quality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 2.1), but all outcomes trended in the expected direction.
conclusionThe findings indicate that our marital choice measures show partial construct validity, linked to normative practices restricting women and girls’ agency at marital entry, and may be a useful indicator of non-forced marriage, but measures of agency at marriage largely do not correlate with agency in marriage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.