ArticleBMC medicine2026
Cortical excitability mapping stratifies neurobiological subtypes of schizophrenia with genetic and molecular signatures.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSchizophrenia (SCZ) is marked by profound biological and clinical heterogeneity, presenting major challenges for accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment. Traditional classifications based solely on clinical presentation are limited by inter-individual variability, overlapping symptom profiles, and low stability across disease stages and treatment states. Dysregulation of the excitation-inhibition (E-I) balance within neural circuits is thought to underpin diverse positive and negative symptoms. Classification based on neural excitability may therefore provide critical insights into disentangling this heterogeneity.
methodsWe applied a cortical excitability (CE) mapping approach to spatially characterize E-I dysregulations in 77 drug-naïve first-episode SCZ (FES) patients and 76 healthy controls (HCs). CE abnormalities were identified using voxel-wise comparisons, and patients were subsequently clustered into subtypes based on the spatial patterns of CE alterations. Longitudinal analyses assessed the subgroups' clinical trajectories over 12 months of antipsychotic treatment. Furthermore, CE maps were integrated with transcriptomic and neuroreceptor datasets to analyse potential molecular mechanisms underlying the observed CE abnormalities.
resultsRelative to HCs, FES patients exhibited CE abnormalities primarily in the bilateral frontal lobes, sensorimotor cortex, and right cuneus. Two subtypes were identified, differing in both the spatial extent of CE abnormalities and their clinical profiles: FES1 showed more widespread CE reductions across frontal and association cortices, associated with greater affective and cognitive burden, whereas FES2 demonstrated a comparatively preserved CE profile and milder symptom expression. Subsequent transcriptomic and receptor analyses revealed distinct biological underpinnings: FES1 was associated with synaptic dysfunction and neurodevelopmental disruption, while FES2 reflected multisystem involvement potentially accompanied by compensatory processes.
conclusionsCE-based subtyping captures clinically and biologically meaningful heterogeneity in FES. Moreover, this approach provides a promising framework for bridging neural circuit dysfunction with molecular signatures and may advance precision psychiatry in SCZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.