ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
A sport-medicine-education collaborative intervention framework for patellar tendinopathy: theoretical foundation and implementation pathway.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an interdisciplinary collaborative framework for implementing Sport-Medicine-Education for managing patellar tendinopathy (PT; note that PT is used throughout this manuscript to refer exclusively to patellar tendinopathy, not physical therapy or physical therapist) and to establish its content validity through expert consensus using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, and Education-Unload-Reload-Prevention.
methodsA multi-phase framework development process was utilized. Phase 1 included systematic literature synthesis with PRISMA guidance, identifying 170 records from PubMed (October 20, 2024), 155 articles to full-text review, and 73 studies eventually included, expert co-creation meetings (n = 15 experts), Delphi consensus generation (3 rounds, 92% agreement), and external validation, including feasibility consultation at three clinical sites. CFIR was utilized to determine implementation facilitators and barriers within five domains. Feasibility of the framework utilized RE-AIM dimensions with 16 specific measures.
resultsThe integrative model includes three main dimensions: Sport Science (load management, biomechanical assessment, performance optimization), Medicine (clinical diagnosis, physical rehabilitation, pain management), and Health Education (patient education, self-management skills, behavioral support). Through the integration of literature synthesis, expert workshops, and Delphi consensus, 23 facilitators and 15 barriers to implementation were identified across the CFIR domains. The five-phase implementation pathway (Pre-implementation→Planning→Active Implementation→Sustainability→Scale-up) was rated for feasibility at 4.2 out of 5.0 on a 5-point Likert scale by the 15-member expert panel during the Delphi process. Based on Delphi consensus, the expert panel established the following RE-AIM target thresholds for future validation: reach of ≥ 70% of eligible patients, effectiveness of at least a 13-point improvement on the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P), adoption across ≥ 3 institutions with complete MDT representation, ≥ 85% implementation fidelity, and ≥ 70% maintenance at 12 months.
conclusionThis study proposes a theory-driven collaborative framework for patellar tendinopathy management that integrates formalized implementation strategies with specified evaluation criteria. The model serves as a conceptual blueprint and implementation manual for the transition from fragmented to integrated multidisciplinary care, with the potential to enhance clinical outcomes and reduce recurrence rates. However, its real-world effectiveness requires empirical validation through prospective implementation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.