Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742188›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical science2026

TRKB-based signature identifies high-risk squamous cell carcinoma cases and TRKB blockade reprograms tumor and stromal cells toward suppressive phenotypes.

Valeria Bartolocci, Alessio Capone, Rosanna Monetta, Erika Di Meo, Silvia Arcano, Carola Valente, Denise Campagna, Massimo Teson, Mara Mancini, Giovanni Di Lella and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Valeria BartolocciLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Alessio CaponeLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Rosanna MonettaLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Erika Di MeoLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Silvia ArcanoLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Carola ValenteLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Denise CampagnaLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Massimo TesonLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Mara ManciniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Di LellaSkin Cancer Center, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Damiano AbeniClinical Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167, Italy, Rome.
Luca FaniaSkin Cancer Center, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Francesca RicciAnatomic Pathology Department, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Vito GomesAnatomic Pathology Department, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Luca ScaglioneBioinformatics Unit, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata, IDI-IRCCS, 00167, Rome, Italy.
Simona MastroeniNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora CandiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Elena DellambraLaboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, Istituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167, Rome, Italy. e.dellambra@idi.it.

Funding

European Union Next Generation EU "M4C1 2022WW4J4B_001, CUP E53D23007320006"Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente RC2022-25LILT "Investigator Grant 5x1000, 2019"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common age-related cancer, with a subset prone to recurrence and metastasis. Currently, no useful diagnostic biomarkers for high-risk cSCC are available. Based on our previous findings, indicating that age-related changes in the neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinase-2 (TrkB) axis may promote skin tumorigenesis, this study aims to identify novel cSCC biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on specimens from patients with in situ or invasive cSCCs using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of TrkB and specific downstream proteins (i.e., E-cadherin, Yap1, and Notch1). Statistical and machine learning analyses were applied to identify biomarkers that distinguish cSCC subtypes and patient risk groups. In vitro studies involved treating SCC cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and three-dimensional (3D) SCC models with the TrkB inhibitor ANA-12. Gene and protein expression were analyzed via RTqPCR, immunoblotting, and immunoassays. Functional assays evaluated cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Secretomes were profiled using cytokine arrays.

resultsProtein expression levels mainly correlated with cSCC types. Our findings indicated that the 'TrkB, E-cadherin, Yap1, Notch1' signature can be a relevant biomarker for both cSCC subtype classification and identification of high-risk cases. Despite the limited sample size, machine learning models demonstrated promising accuracy in differentiating between cSCC classes. Our analysis also highlighted the added value of including stromal markers for classifying high-risk patients. Furthermore, TrkB blockade suppressed tumorigenic traits in TP53-mutant SCC cells, including proliferation, EMT, migration, invasiveness, and disruption of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling loop, while promoting differentiation and senescence through modulation of key players such as p63, Yap1, Notch1, and p21. Data are consistent with a tumor-suppressive effect, thereby promoting tissue homeostasis, especially in physiologically relevant 3D models. Inhibiting TrkB reprogrammed primary CAFs into a less proliferative, migratory, inflammatory, and fibrotic phenotype by simultaneously suppressing key activating pathways, such as β-catenin, Yap1, and Notch1. This aligns with a reduction in their tumor-supportive functions.

conclusionsOur findings provide a basis for improved high-risk patient stratification by highlighting a TrkB-based signature and generating prototype predictive models. Furthermore, they offer promising therapeutic avenues for developing combined targeted interventions to overcome resistance in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

3D SCC modelsCancer-associated fibroblastsCutaneous squamous cell carcinomaSkinTrkB

Identifiers

PMID41742188
PMCPMC12934051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.