Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742178›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

General practice prestige: understanding medical students' perceptions - a repeated cross-sectional study.

Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Laura Plotho, Andrea Siebenhofer, Anna Mangge, Stephanie Poggenburg, Alexander Avian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulrike Spary-KainzInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Laura PlothoInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. laura.plotho@medunigraz.at.
Andrea SiebenhoferInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anna ManggeDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stephanie PoggenburgInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Alexander AvianInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA global shortage of general practitioners (GPs) is partly due to the limited number of medical students interested in working in the field. Prestige is one of several factors influencing choice of medical specialty. This study examined medical students’ perceptions of the prestige attached to working in general practice and how their career intentions evolved at medical school.

methodsA repeated cross-sectional survey was conducted among students at the Medical University of Graz between 2018 and 2023. Data were collected at six time-points in every academic year. Prestige was assessed using items from a questionnaire developed to assess medical students’ attitudes towards general practice. Factor scores were calculated and compared between time-points and between changes in career aspirations.

resultsThe number of students aspiring to become a GP increased at medical school (1.1% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.001), while the number of undecided students decreased (67.2% vs. 62.4%, p < 0.001). Students initially considered general practice to be more prestigious (0.47 ± 0.86) than later in their studies (0.23 ± 0.96; p < 0.001). Students uninterested in working in general practice rated prestige lower than interested students (0.19, 95%CI: 0.12–0.26 vs. 0.62, 95% CI 0.42–0.81; p = 0.002) and undecided students (0.35, 95% CI 0.32–0.39; p < 0.001). By the end of medical school, more students considered general practice to have a poor reputation relative to other specialties (p < 0.001), similar to political decision-makers (p < 0.001), but considered a high reputation among patients and society as a whole (p < 0.001).

conclusionThese findings highlight the need for positive educational experiences and stronger recognition of general practice within the medical community.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceGeneral PracticeStudents, MedicalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCareer choiceGeneral practiceMedical studentsPerception of prestige

Identifiers

PMID41742178
PMCPMC13040739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.