Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Motor imagery-based neurofeedback in older adults: neural signatures and feasibility in a randomized controlled trial targeting age-related cognitive decline.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurofeedback (NF) is a non-invasive endogenous stimulation technique that enables individuals to voluntarily modulate brain activity, which has shown potential to induce neuroplasticity. Among its promising applications is cognitive enhancement in healthy older adults to prevent age-related cognitive decline. However, its efficacy remains controversial due to methodological limitations and a high proportion of individuals unable to achieve effective self-regulation, known as non-responders. This study aimed (1) to evaluate the feasibility of motor imagery (MI)-based NF training in older adults and characterize associated brain activity patterns; and (2) to assess its potential cognitive benefits through a randomized, double-blind, controlled design.
methodsNinety-two healthy participants aged 65–75 were randomly assigned to a training (TG), placebo (PG), or control group (CG). TG and PG completed ten electroencephalography (EEG)-based NF sessions over ten weeks, while CG engaged in ten classical cognitive stimulation sessions. All participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation prior to and following the intervention. EEG data from the NF training sessions were analyzed using spectral and network metrics to characterize modulations in local activity and large-scale functional network patterns induced by the intervention.
resultsAlthough a substantial proportion of TG participants achieved high MI accuracy values, statistical analyses revealed no cognitive improvements specific to TG, suggesting limited efficacy of the MI-based protocol compared to classical cognitive stimulation. Spectral and network analyses identified distinct modulation patterns during MI in responders, absent in non-responders. Moreover, specific resting-state features—namely increased [Formula: see text] (13–20 Hz) band relative power and reduced α (8–13 Hz) band node strength—were associated with better self-regulation performance.
conclusionsThe present study did not provide conclusive evidence supporting the effectiveness of MI-based NF training for cognitive enhancement in older adults. Nonetheless, the results offer valuable insights that may inform the refinement of future NF-based cognitive training protocols. Moreover, our findings suggest that baseline functional network organization may play a key role in determining the capacity for successful self-regulation. Identifying additional neurophysiological biomarkers will be essential to advance our understanding of the non-responsiveness phenomenon and to enable the development of more personalized NF interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.