ArticleBMC oral health2026
Clinically interpretable deep learning for pediatric dental age estimation with explainable AI.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence in dental imaging: a systematic review of interpretability and the current state of trust evidence.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronological age estimation is essential for forensic science, law enforcement, and treatment planning. Dental orthopantomography (OPG) is widely used for this purpose, yet most conventional approaches remain rule based, slow, examiner dependent, and sensitive to image quality and dental variations.
methodsPediatric OPGs from children aged 5–15 years were used to train and evaluate five deep learning networks, namely ConvNeXt-Tiny, ResNet-50, EfficientNet-B0, DenseNet-121 and Xception. With these models, ensemble strategies were developed and evaluated. Model performances were assessed using MAE, RMSE and R2. Additionally, explainable AI (XAI) heatmaps were generated to visualize and examine age informative regions.
resultsThe proposed median ensemble achieved the best performance with an MAE of 0.616 years (≈ 7.4 months), outperforming all single networks. XAI analyses indicated that the models based their predictions on clinically plausible dental regions, with Xception providing the most precise and concentrated attributions.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the median ensemble deep learning approach provides robust and examiner-independent pediatric age estimation from OPGs. This framework significantly reduces prediction errors compared with individual models. Furthermore, the integration of XAI-based visual explanations enhances interpretability, positioning this approach as a valuable decision support tool for forensic and dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.