ArticleBMC oral health2026
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of dental flossing among the Saudi population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental floss is essential for removing interproximal plaque and preventing periodontal disease. Despite its proven benefits, flossing is often underutilized due to factors such as limited knowledge, cultural perceptions, and behavioral habits. This study assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to dental flossing among Saudi adults.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a snowball sampling approach across five regions of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via an online questionnaire, and 990 eligible responses were analyzed. Ethical approval was obtained from the Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB-2023-DOH-008).
resultsAmong the respondents, 23.9% reported never using dental floss, and 33.4% used it rarely. Misconceptions were common, with 43% of respondents believing that flossing creates gaps between teeth. Age ≥ 35 years was significantly associated with knowing how to use dental floss (p = 0.034) and a lower degree of difficulty with dental floss (p = 0.007). Women – compared to men - were more likely to know dental floss (p < 0.001), how to use it (p < 0.001), and actually use flossing (p = 0.013). Moreover, women tended to do flossing more frequently (p = 0.001), encountered less difficulty (p = 0.009), and were more likely to recommend it to others (p < 0.001). In addition, having a university education was significantly associated with using dental floss (p = 0.024). Multivariable logistic regression showed that women (adjusted OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.05, p = 0.035) and participants with a university degree were more likely to use floss regularly (adjusted OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.00, p = 0.003), after adjusting for age, region, and marital status.
conclusionWhile general awareness of dental flossing is high, consistent use remains limited, especially among men and younger individuals. Barriers such as perceived difficulty and misinformation persist. Targeted educational campaigns are needed to bridge knowledge-practice gaps and promote regular flossing as part of routine oral care in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.