Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742117›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Integrating aqli (rationale) and naqli (revealed) knowledge in AI-driven clinical decision support systems to enhance healthcare delivery for guiding termination of pregnancy among Muslim patients: a systematic review (1).

Lutfil Hadi Kamaruzaman, Hayati Abdul Rahman, Nadeeya 'Ayn Umaisara Mohd Nor, Nur Zaireena Zainal, Zizi Mohd Mohd Yusof, Muhamad Rafiqi Hehsan, Nur Abdul Abdul Rahman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lutfil Hadi KamaruzamanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Nilai, Malaysia.
Hayati Abdul RahmanPerinatal Pathology & Academic Fellow, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Nilai, Malaysia.
Nadeeya 'Ayn Umaisara Mohd NorPublic Health Specialist (Family Health), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Nilai, Malaysia.
Nur Zaireena ZainalFetomaternal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Nilai, Malaysia.
Zizi Mohd Mohd YusofFiqh of Medicine, Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800, Malaysia. ziziazlinda@usim.edu.my.
Muhamad Rafiqi HehsanIntensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Nur Abdul Abdul RahmanMedical Education Unit & Department of Primary Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Persiaran Ilmu, Negeri Sembilan, Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800, Malaysia. nurfaraheen@usim.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Termination of pregnancy (TOP) is an important issue in perinatal health, yet culturally responsive clinical decision-making supports system (CDSS) surrounding TOP remains underexplored. The utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) particularly in CDSS, is on the rise and can facilitate healthcare professionals (HCPs) in making clinical decisions for TOP. Clinical guidelines on TOP are relatively devoid of religious guidance, and in Muslim majority countries such as Malaysia, this deficiency imposes extra cognitive and psychological burden of reasonings upon HCPs, patients and families. There is also a paucity of evidence on integrated clinical and Islamic approach towards TOP CDSS for Muslim patients. This gap warrants a closer look at pregnancy termination among Muslim patients and CDSS impact on obstetric care, including barriers and facilitators of the AI-driven CDSS for TOP. Seven (7) databases search was conducted using related MeSH and individual terms. Forty-six articles for the áqli (rationale) and 59 items for the naqli (revealed) knowledge sections were included and synthesised. Key themes for the áqli knowledge for exploring AI-driven vs traditional CDSS are knowledge foundations, decisions, data inputs, and personalisation, while barriers uncover themes of ethics: bias and transparency; trust; and learning capacity. Facilitators’ themes are demographic data; hybrid AI-driven CDSS model; and multimodal data syntheses. The naqli component themes include knowledge from Quran, knowledge from hadith, and divergence of jurisprudence scholars. This review proposes an AI-driven time-sensitive CDSS for TOP framework among Muslim patients as a solution to address issues related to it. Gaps and future directions are also discussed.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedArtificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDelivery of Health CareIslamFemaleHumansPregnancyAbortionArtificial intelligence (AI)Clinical decision support system (CDSS)Maternal healthTermination of pregnancy (TOP)

Identifiers

PMID41742117
PMCPMC13141258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.