Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742089›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Efficacy of SLNB in early endometrial adenocarcinoma in China: a retrospective cohort study based on inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Lingjuan Hu, Xiaofeng Chen, Xudong Hu, Jingyuan Luo, Huanmei Lin, Xiujun Zhu, Yanmei Sun, Jing Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lingjuan Hu *The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaofeng Chen *The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xudong Hu *The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jingyuan LuoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Huanmei LinDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiujun ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanmei SunDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. sumssunny@163.com.
Jing XiaoDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. xiaojingson_2004@gzucm.edu.cn.

Funding

Zhaoyang Talent Special Project from Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine ZY2022YL15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial cancer significantly impacts women’s reproductive health and quality of life, with lymph node metastasis serving as a crucial prognostic factor. Given the low metastasis rate, not all early-stage patients require lymph node dissection. The NCCN upgraded Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) technology to Class 2A evidence. However, the applicability of SLNB for Chinese patients remains uncertain. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SLNB in a Chinese population.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from August 2019 to December 2022, involving 166 early-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma patients. Of these, 137 patients were assessed as moderate to high-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Patients were divided into Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB, N = 43) and systematic lymph node dissection (SLND, N = 94) groups, with a median follow-up time of 39 (24, 55) months. Primary outcomes were postoperative disease progression-free survival and one-month complication rates, with secondary endpoints including surgical parameters and quality of life indicators.

resultDuring the follow-up(median follow-up time 39 months), 1 recurrence occurred in the SLNB group, with no recurrences in the SLND group. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) showed no statistically significant differences compared with traditional Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) in oncological assessment, with no significant variations in postoperative pathological staging (β = 0.80, 95%CI: -1.29 to 2.90, p = 0.455), pathological grading (β = -0.115, 95%CI: -0.99 to 0.76, p = 0.800), and additional treatment evaluation (β = -0.214, 95%CI: -1.52 to 1.09, p = 0.749), with one recurrence in the SLNB group during follow-up. SLNB significantly improved surgical indicators: operation time reduced by 85.13 min (p < 0.001), blood loss decreased by 44.82 ml (p < 0.001), hospital stay shortened by 1.19 days (p = 0.030), with significantly lower postoperative day 1 pain scores. At 6 h post-surgery, both groups showed significant BADL decline (β = -21.53, 95%CI: -25.7 to -17.4, p < 0.001), with less functional impairment in the SLNB group and significantly shorter urinary catheter placement time (β = + 1.24, 95%CI: 0.90 to 1.59, p < 0.001). Complication analysis revealed significantly higher rates of lymphatic reflux obstruction (β = 18.22, 95%CI: 17.38 to 19.05, p < 0.001) and intestinal obstruction (β = 18.17, 95%CI: 16.16 to 20.17, p < 0.001) in the SLND group, suggesting a marked advantage of SLNB in complication management.

conclusionFor early-stage endometrial cancer patients with moderate to high differentiation and lesions confined to the inner half of the myometrium, SLNB demonstrates safety and efficacy as a minimally invasive alternative, significantly improving surgical outcomes and patient prognosis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEndometrial NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesChinese patientsEndometrial CancerLaparoscopic SurgeryPostoperative ComplicationsSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41742089
PMCPMC13041019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.