ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Conservative management of a spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma in the third trimester: a rare case report.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma during pregnancy is an extremely rare clinical event. Although not categorized as a primary obstetric emergency, it poses significant challenges in clinical diagnosis and management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old patient at 33 + 5 weeks of gestation presented with acute abdominal and low back pain. Imaging revealed a large, multiloculated cystic mass posterior to the cervix with internal hemorrhagic signals, which was initially misdiagnosed as a hemorrhagic ovarian cyst. Under ultrasound guidance, culdocentesis was performed, draining 85 mL of non-clotting blood, leading to subsequent symptom relief. Serial follow-up demonstrated overall gradual shrinkage of the mass, with a transient postoperative increase at one week, followed by continued shrinkage. An elective cesarean section was performed at 39 + 1 weeks. Intraoperative exploration identified normal bilateral ovaries, with no evidence of cysts or adhesions in the pelvic cavity. Postpartum MRI confirmed a residual mass with mixed signals in the original location, leading to a definitive diagnosis of retroperitoneal hematoma. Subsequent imaging showed near-complete resolution of the hematoma, with only organized tissue remaining. This case culminated in a successful full-term delivery with favorable outcomes for both the mother and the neonate.
conclusionSpontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis for pregnant women presenting with acute abdominal pain or back pain, particularly when associated with an adnexal mass. Furthermore, the favorable natural course of the hematoma observed in this stable patient provides valuable insights into the potential for conservative management of this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.