ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Electrophysiological evidence about sexual dimorphism in the clonidine-induced inhibition of trigeminal wide dynamic range cell activity.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe trigeminal system plays a key role in headaches pathophysiology. In this regard, nociceptive experiments in male rodents have shown that at the trigeminal level, clonidine induces antinociception through α2A- but not α2B/2C-adrenoceptors. Interestingly, although behavioural experiments suggest that males are more sensitive to clonidine-induced antinociception than female rats (an effect linked to hormonal factors), little is known about how neuronal nociceptive processing is affected in females (including the role of the α2A/2B/2C-adrenoceptors subtypes involved). Since trigeminal second-order wide dynamic range (WDR) cells are one of the main gatekeepers involved in decoding and processing nociceptive inputs from peripheral facial structures, this study was designed to test the effect of clonidine on trigeminal WDR cell activity in male and female rats.
methodsExtracellular unitary recordings of trigeminal WDR cells were performed in anaesthetised Wistar rats and analysed as Aδ-, and C-fibres associated discharge. Under these conditions, the effect of local clonidine (3.1–31 nmol) on electrical periorbital-evoked firing of WDR cells was recorded in both sexes. Furthermore, considering that at least three α2-adrenoceptor subtypes exist (α2A-, α2B-, and α2C-adrenoceptors), pharmacological blockade of these receptor subtypes was performed using BRL 44408 (α2A), imiloxan (α2B), and JP-1302 (α2C).
resultsClonidine inhibited the activity of Aδ-, and C-fibres in male and female rats. This inhibition was observed in 50–60% of cells recorded. Furthermore, the dose necessary to induce similar electrophysiological antinociception was higher in females (31 nmol vs. 10 nmol). In males, but not in females, clonidine-induced inhibition of Aδ- and C-fibres activity was reversed using BRL 44408. Whereas in females, imiloxan and JP-1302 reversed the clonidine-induced inhibition of Aδ- but not C-fibres.
conclusionMale rodents are more sensitive than females to clonidine-induced WDR antinociception. In males, but not in females, clonidine-induced inhibition of Aδ- and C-fibres discharge relies on α2A-adrenoceptor activation. However, in females, the activation of α2B/2C-adrenoceptors seems to be relevant to Aδ- but not C-fibre discharge inhibition by clonidine, implying that other mechanism/receptors may be involved in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.