ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Assessing the efficacy of combined treatment using bedaquiline against clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro and the macrophage model.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCombination treatments can shorten treatment time and reduce drug side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of combined treatment using bedaquiline (BDQ) against clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis).
methodsThis cross-sectional study was performed on 15 drug-resistant isolates of M. tuberculosis. After determining the Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics, the fractional inhibitor concentration index (FICI) was evaluated using a checkerboard resazurin microtitration assay (REMA) to evaluate their interaction profiles against the M. tuberculosis isolates. The macrophage model was used to study the activity of synergistic compounds and the expression level of macrophage genes were evaluated by real-time PCR.
resultsAll isolates had MIC ≥ 0.25 µg/mL for BDQ. Of the 15 isolates, only 2 observed a synergistic effect between BDQ and other antibiotics. The expression of macrophage genes (FABP5, HERG, RPL24, and SCARB1) infected with these two isolates, was significantly increased by the combination of BDQ+ gemifloxacin (GEM), BDQ + Rifampicin (RIF), BDQ + moxifloxacin (MFX), and BDQ + isoniazid (INH) (p < 0.01).
conclusionDespite resistance to BDQ, the combination treatments showed a positive effect in the macrophage cell line model. Therefore, it can be concluded that the combination treatment with BDQ may enhanced the innate immune response of macrophages against M. tuberculosis infection and also reduce the MIC of BDQ and other antibiotics in combination with it. This suggests a potential for more effective treatment for drug-resistant isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.