Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742011›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

The greenhouse as an integrated management strategy for Prodiplosis longifila Gagné, 1986: effects on infestation and pesticide use.

Maria Esmeralda Cuzco, Amalia Marisol Vera, Maria Leticia Vivas, John Eloy Franco, Maria Teresa Lao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Esmeralda CuzcoCarrera de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Guayaquil, Av. Las aguas y Juan Tanca Marengo, Guayaquil, 090112, Ecuador. maria.cuzcoc@ug.edu.ec.
Amalia Marisol VeraCarrera de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Guayaquil, Av. Las aguas y Juan Tanca Marengo, Guayaquil, 090112, Ecuador.
Maria Leticia VivasCarrera de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Guayaquil, Av. Las aguas y Juan Tanca Marengo, Guayaquil, 090112, Ecuador.
John Eloy FrancoCarrera de Agropecuaria, Facultad de Educación Técnica para el Desarrollo, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Av. C. J. Arosemena Km. 1.5, Guayaquil, 09014671, Ecuador.
Maria Teresa LaoDepartamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, CIAIMBITAL, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), Universidad de Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, Almería, 04120, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTomato production on the Ecuadorian coast is primarily carried out in open fields and has declined due to infestation by Prodiplosis longifila. Its short life cycle and rapid recolonization necessitate intensive chemical control, generating selection pressure and environmental risks. P. longifila exhibits high ecological plasticity and, due to its potential for expansion, has been included by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the list of priority pests, with a risk of establishment in temperate regions of Europe and coastal areas of the Mediterranean. Given the urgent need for sustainable strategies to revitalize tomato production, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of greenhouse use by comparing infestation levels, population density, the effectiveness of sticky traps, and pesticide efficacy in two cultivation systems: open fields and greenhouses.

resultsThe population dynamics of Prodiplosis longifila varied significantly among the cultivation systems. In greenhouse, infestation above the threshold ranged from 13% to 21.9%, while in open field it reached critical levels of 61.3%. Monitoring adults using traps is not a good indicator of abundance. Pesticide efficacy varies depending on the environment and infestation level. In greenhouse, the biorational insecticides spinetoram and abamectin achieved efficacies exceeding 80% in infestations of 10% to 20%, Azadirachta indica caused burns at high temperatures, and the efficacy of abamectin decreased. In open field, the neonicotinoids acetamiprid and imidacloprid achieved efficacies of up to 90% in extreme infestations (50%–61%), and the efficacy of thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin decreased after the third application. A positive correlation was observed between temperature and larval density, while relative humidity had a negative effect. The results demonstrate that direct monitoring is an effective tool for optimizing the number of applications and that anti-aphids mesh is a physical barrier to reduce infestation, allowing for the rational use of pesticides.

conclusionThe use of anti-aphid mesh in greenhouse significantly reduces infestation by P. longifila, decreases the frequency of spraying, and promotes the selection of biorational pesticides. This positions greenhouses as an alternative for revitalizing tomato production in areas affected by this pest. The results are relevant for tropical contexts and provide valuable information for designing prevention and management policies in at-risk regions.

Indexed as

Insect ControlInsecticidesPesticidesSolanum lycopersicumAgricultureAnimalsIvermectinLarvaNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPopulation DynamicsimidaclopridInsecticidesIvermectinNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPesticidesIntegrated pest management, population dynamicsMonitoringPesticide efficiencySampling methods

Identifiers

PMID41742011
PMCPMC13041040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.