Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741926›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Parental Perceptions of Benefits and Risks Concerning Mental Health Biomarker Testing for Adolescents.

Kaustubh Kishor Jadhav, Kirsi Kuuru, Eeva Aromaa, Aino-Kaisa Piironen, Päivi Eriksson, Katja M Kanninen, Tommi Tolmunen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaustubh Kishor JadhavA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Kirsi KuuruBusiness School, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Eeva AromaaBusiness School, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Aino-Kaisa PiironenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Päivi ErikssonBusiness School, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Katja M KanninenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tommi TolmunenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. tommi.tolmunen@kuh.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatry currently lacks clinically relevant biomarkers, though recent developments in this field have shown promise. Nevertheless, a noticeable gap exists in understanding parental perspectives regarding such technologies. Thus, this study aimed to investigate parental perceptions about mental health biomarker (MHB) testing for adolescents, as they play a pivotal role in guiding decisions about their children's healthcare. An online survey was conducted in Finland, targeting 1500 parents of adolescents aged 10-17. A 20-item questionnaire was used to assess parental perceptions of the benefits and risks associated with MHB testing. Psychometric measures were applied to validate the questionnaire, and a Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was performed to examine parental perspectives across various demographic factors. Based on 174 questionnaire responses, parents were modestly supportive of the perceived benefits and expressed marginally lower concern about the possible risks associated with MHB testing. MANOVA indicated that some demographic variables were significantly associated with perceived benefits and risks. Notably, higher perceived benefits of adolescent MHB testing were reported by relatively younger parents and those with an undergraduate degree. Additionally, parents with a family history of mental health problems reported greater perceived benefits and lower perceived risks. The findings suggest that perceptions of the benefits and risks of MHB testing differ, with demographics influencing these perceptions. However, further research is warranted to explore the impact of these perceptions on the utility and acceptance of MHB testing among parents and adolescents.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMental DisordersMental HealthParentsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPsychometricsRisk AssessmentBiomarkersAdolescentAttitudeBiomarkerMental healthPerceptionTesting

Identifiers

PMID41741926
PMCPMC13451226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.