ArticleProgress in orthodontics2026
Automated deep learning detection of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in maxillary incisors on panoramic radiographs.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and compare two YOLOv12-based deep learning models-object detection and pose estimation-for the automatic classification of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption (OIEARR) using panoramic radiographs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 624 panoramic radiographs obtained from 312 patients aged 10-18 who underwent at least 12 months of fixed orthodontic treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Each maxillary central and lateral incisor was graded for OIEARR severity on a 4-point scale (Grade 0 to Grade 3) by two experienced orthodontists serving as the ground truth. Two YOLOv12-based models were trained: an object detection (OD) model for regional analysis and a pose estimation (PE) model for anatomical landmark localization. Both models were trained and validated on annotated panoramic images and evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1-score, confusion matrix, and ROC-AUC.
resultsThe PE model outperformed the OD model across all evaluation metrics, demonstrating superior performance in detecting OIEARR. Specifically, the PE model achieved a weighted F1-score of 0.88, compared to 0.60 for the OD model. It also showed higher accuracy (0.93 vs. 0.78), precision (0.88 vs. 0.64), and recall (0.88 vs. 0.59), confirming its robustness in root resorption classification. Particularly in Grade 1 and Grade 2 resorption categories, the PE model demonstrated markedly superior classification performance (F1 = 0.85 and 0.88, respectively), while maintaining excellent detection in Grade 3 cases (F1 = 0.95). Confusion matrix analysis revealed that most misclassifications occurred between neighboring grades. ROC-AUC values for the PE model were consistently high (0.90-0.99), indicating strong discriminative ability across all resorption stages.
conclusionsThe YOLOv12x PE model offers a reliable and sensitive tool for detecting varying degrees of root resorption on panoramic radiographs. Its fine-grained anatomical localization capabilities provide an advantage for early diagnosis, making it a promising approach for clinical decision support in orthodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.