ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Optimizing renal mass histology prediction with artificial intelligence using handcrafted radiomics.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the histology of a renal mass, physicians cannot rely on imaging alone. Radiomics—the extraction of quantitative data from medical imaging—could help address this challenge. This study aimed to build a classification model using CT-scan radiomics and/or clinical features to distinguish clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other histologies.
methodsWe included patients who underwent surgery for suspected localized RCC. A total of 345 masses were included (72% ccRCC, 28% other histologies). Clinical data were extracted and each renal mass was manually segmented on CT and CECT (contrast enhanced CT). Then, 171 radiomics features were extracted from each lesion. The dataset was randomly split into a learning set (80%) and a hold-out set (20%). The learning set was further portioned into 10 subsets; each subset was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets and used to train and test 10 independent machine learning models using the XGBoost algorithm. The best model was subsequently validated on the hold-out set.
resultsThe CECT-based radiomics model showed the best performance: AUC = 0.80, sensitivity = 67% and specificity = 77%. Adding clinical features to the model did not improve its performance. Using the hold-out set, the final model achieved an AUC of 0.88, with 56% sensitivity and 93% specificity.
conclusionsOur radiomics-based classification model showed high performance in differentiating ccRCC from other histologies using CECT scans. These findings support the role of radiomics as a potential non-invasive tool in kidney cancer management. However, external validation on independent cohorts is needed before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.