ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Radiopharmaceuticals: Status, Regulatory Landscape and Future Perspective.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiopharmaceuticals are biologically active molecules labeled with radionuclides that have advanced the possibility of the nuclear medicine. They support non-invasive, high-resolution diagnostic imaging of molecular and physiological processes in vivo. The techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) utilize short-lived β⁺ and γ-emitting isotopes to generate highly sensitive, three-dimensional assessments of biological function. In therapeutic applications, radionuclides that emit β⁻ particles, α particles, or Auger electrons enable targeted delivery of cytotoxic radiation to diseased tissues, while limiting off-target exposure to the healthy cells. The choice of radionuclide is guided by decay characteristics, half-life, production feasibility, and cost, and is coupled to a small molecule, peptide, antibody, or nanoparticle via bifunctional chelators that ensure in-vivo stability and precise biodistribution. Recent approvals highlight this clinical momentum, including Copper-64/Copper-67, a chemically matched theranostic radionuclide pair that reduces chelator-related variability and streamlines diagnostic therapeutic supply chains, Lutetium Lu-177 dotatate, an FDA approved radioligand therapy, and Lutetium Lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan, a prostate cancer targeted radioligand therapy illustrate the clinical momentum of this field, yet hurdles remain in large-scale isotope supply, formulation robustness, and regulatory harmonization. This review highlights key innovations in vector design, radionuclide production, and formulation; explores how artificial intelligence is transforming imaging and therapy planning; and clarifies the shifting regulatory landscape for clinical translation. By highlighting both current achievements and future research priorities, we provide a comprehensive framework by integrating productions challenges, formulation considerations, and regulatory harmonization into a unified perspective that deliver precision imaging and personalized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.