ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence and CT Neuroimaging in Dementia and Psychotic Disorders: A Viewpoint.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychotic disorders are marked by heterogeneity in symptoms and treatment response, yet efforts to develop clinically useful predictive models through neuroimaging have been limited. Although MRI is gold standard for neuroimaging in psychosis, CT is frequently used in psychiatric care due to accessibility and cost. Advances in artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, offer the potential for extracting meaningful information from CT brain scans. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies applying machine learning, including deep learning to CT brain imaging in dementia or psychotic disorders. Six databases were searched from inception to Nov. 22, 2024. Studies were included if they involved deep or machine learning models using CT scans for diagnostic or prognostic modelling. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST + AI; reporting quality was evaluated with TRIPOD-AI or CLAIM. Seven studies met inclusion criteria: one related to psychosis and six to dementia. All studies included used deep learning models for classification or segmentation. Sample sizes ranged from 65 to 917. All predictive studies were rated as high risk of bias. TRIPOD-AI adherence was limited with most items poorly reported (16-21/27). Segmentation studies had low-to-moderate CLAIM adherence with limitations in external validation, code availability and reproducibility. Only one study to date has applied deep learning to CT imaging in psychosis. Research in dementia offers transferable insights. From a translational viewpoint, future work should prioritise the construction of large and well characterised psychosis cohorts including medical imaging, clinical and functional outcome prediction, external validation and transparent methodology to support clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.