ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Visual Field Mean Deviation from Numeric OCT Data in Glaucoma.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose is to evaluate whether numeric optical coherence tomography (OCT) data can predict Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HFA) 30-2 mean deviation (MD) using deep learning (DL). In this retrospective study, 1200 eyes (432 glaucoma and 768 normal eyes) that underwent spectral-domain OCT (12 × 9.0-mm high-density scanning) and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 30-2 testing on the same day were analyzed. Pixel-wise retinal thickness numeric values were directly exported from OCT and input into eight deep learning models, including five convolutional neural networks (ResNet50, VGG16, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB0, and DenseNet121) and three vision transformers (ViT, DeiT, and BEiT). Two distinct prediction tasks were performed: (1) a regression task to predict continuous HFA MD values and (2) a classification task to discriminate VF deterioration at predefined MD thresholds. For the regression task, model performance was assessed using standard regression metrics, and agreement between predicted and measured MD values was additionally evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis. For the classification task, model performance was evaluated using threshold-based discrimination metrics. Both tasks were evaluated using fivefold cross-validation. The mean age was 63.3 ± 21.5 years, axial length 25.43 ± 1.33 mm, and baseline MD - 5.32 ± 4.33 dB. Among all models, InceptionV3 achieved the best performance, with a mean absolute error of 3.36 dB and a coefficient of determination of 0.53. In classification analyses at clinically relevant MD thresholds, CNN-based models achieved high discrimination performance across early, moderate, and severe visual field loss. We developed an accurate and explainable DL system directly leveraging raw numeric OCT thickness data to predict HFA 30-2 MD values; this predictive DL approach may enhance diagnosis of glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.