Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741819›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Events at predicted location expand in time.

Shamini Warda, Azizuddin Khan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shamini WardaPsychophysiology Laboratory, Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India.
Azizuddin KhanPsychophysiology Laboratory, Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India. khanaziz@iitb.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5113-4760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictability is a key factor that influences the perceived duration of an event. Prior studies investigating the effect of prediction on perceived duration were predominantly interested in the predictions related to the identity of the upcoming target. In this study, we sought to investigate the effect of location-based predictions on perceived duration with the concurrent tracking of eye movements. The results suggest a pattern of longer perceived duration when the event appeared at the predicted location. A higher sensitivity towards the events appearing at the unpredicted location was observed under conditions when prestimulus eye movements were controlled. The results further demonstrate that the apparent expansion of the perceived duration of events at the predicted location was accompanied by longer fixation duration and smaller saccadic amplitude. Additionally, the pupil size following the target offset was larger for the predicted conditions. The measures of fixation duration and pupil size are reliable markers to capture ongoing attentional processes, and therefore, we suggest that attentional mechanisms might underlie the duration expansion of events occurring at predicted locations.

Indexed as

AttentionEye-movement measuresPerceived durationPredictive processes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.