Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741812›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2026

Does hyaluronic acid affect hard tissue healing in alveolar bone augmentation procedures? A systematic review of controlled clinical trials.

Lukas Bayyigit, Danijel Domic, Christian Ulm, Kristina Bertl, Andreas Stavropoulos

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lukas BayyigitDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6179-5512
Danijel DomicDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7799-6629
Christian UlmDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2396-8773
Kristina BertlDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Vienna, Austria. kristina.bertl@med.sfu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8279-7943
Andreas StavropoulosDepartment of Periodontology, Blekinge Hospital, Hälsovägen, Byggnad 13, 371 41, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-3754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide an overview on the effect of hyaluronic acid (HyA) on hard tissue healing in alveolar bone augmentation procedures in humans (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023464863).

methodsThree databases were searched until April 2025. Studies using HyA in any form and in any alveolar bone augmentation procedure were included, if a control group allowing to assess the effect of HyA was available; studies addressing periodontal regeneration or using HyA coated implants were not included. Primary outcome parameters, summarized descriptively, were histologic/radiographic new bone formation (NBF), alveolar ridge width (ARW) and height (ARH). The Cochrane Collaborations RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess the risk of bias.

resultsFourteen studies with a follow-up of 3-12 months were included, which contributed with 229 patients and 317 sites allowing to assess the effect of HyA. HyA was assessed as adjunct to maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA), guided bone regeneration (GBR), and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). The addition of HyA significantly improved NBF in 50 and 66% of the MSFA and ARP studies, respectively; however, a significant clinical improvement was not consistently observed. Advantages for NBF as well as ARW or ARH gain have been reported in GBR procedures, but the available data are limited and mostly descriptive. No differences were observed regarding reported post-operative complication rates. Due to the heterogeneity in treatments and outcome measures, as well as the limited number of studies, a meta-analysis was not feasible for any of the outcomes.

conclusionsIn the original studies, positive and occasionally significant results have been reported for the adjunct use of HyA in alveolar bone augmentation; however, the effect size and clinical relevance is unclear, and further clinical research is needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: HyA in alveolar bone augmentation is safe, but it remains unclear in which indication and in which application form it may enhance quality and/or quantity of NBF and at what extent.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationHyaluronic AcidWound HealingControlled Clinical Trials as TopicHumansHyaluronic AcidAlveolar bone augmentationAlveolar ridge preservationGuided bone regenerationHyaluronic acidMaxillary sinus floor augmentationNew bone formation

Identifiers

PMID41741812
PMCPMC12935739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.