ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026
Residual Acetabular Dysplasia in Young Children: a Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modified Pemberton osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children: a mid- to long-term follow-up study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewResidual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) is a common condition where the acetabulum remains shallow or underdeveloped even after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Proper management of RAD is crucial in reducing the risk of hip instability and premature arthritis. This review summarizes the most recent evidence related to the diagnosis and management of RAD in patients during their first decade of life, with an emphasis on data that may inform clinical decision-making and highlight areas in need of further investigation. RECENT
findingsRecent studies have shown that rigid abduction bracing significantly improves RAD in patients over six months of age compared to observation only and has minimal treatment complications. Furthermore, bracing has been shown to have a dose-dependent relationship with improvement in acetabular index (AI). Surgical treatment of RAD with pelvic osteotomy significantly improves AI compared to all other treatment approaches, though several studies indicate a reduced effect among older patients. The exact timing and indications for surgical intervention remain controversial. The management of RAD remains an active area of research, particularly regarding the timing and indications for surgical intervention. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of rigid abduction bracing for patients with RAD over the age of six months to assist in acetabular remodeling, with a low complication rate. Pelvic osteotomy provides the most significant improvement in AI compared to all other approaches, with some evidence suggesting that these procedures become less effective as patients get older. However, as the timeline for surgical intervention remains unclear, there is a need for shared decision-making when managing RAD, along with additional long-term prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.