ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Prediction of recurrence and functional status in young ischemic stroke patients: Comparison of machine learning and traditional statistical methods.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends and emerging frontiers in young-onset stroke: a bibliometric analysis (1996-2026).Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
65 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIschemic stroke in young adults is a significant social and economic burden. Machine learning (ML) techniques can potentially predict the outcomes of recurrence and functional status after a stroke more accurately than traditional statistical methods. We sought to predict these outcomes in young individuals with stroke with machine learning and compare that with traditional statistical methods.
methodsThis study is part of Global Outcome Assessment Lifelong After Stroke in Young Adults (GOAL) initiative, which collects individual patient data from hospital-based young stroke (18–50 years) cohorts from 29 countries covering all continents worldwide. We compared several common machine learning models with traditional logistic regression to investigate the best models for predicting functional outcome, as measured by the modified Rankin scale at three months post-stroke, and stroke recurrence during follow-up.
resultsFunctional outcome was available for 7937 patients, and stroke recurrence for 9366 patients. Poor functional outcomes post-stroke occurred in 27.0% of cases, and stroke recurrence in 10.1% of cases during a median follow-up time of 75 months. For functional outcome, multilayer perceptron model achieved the highest mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) at 0.92 ± 0.08. Random forest model attained the highest AUC (0.68 ± 0.03) for predicting stroke recurrence. However, their results were not statistically significantly higher than those for logistic regression.
conclusionOur work explored the use of machine learning to predict outcomes in young stroke patients. However, in our cohort, ML methods provided only moderate added value compared to logistic regression for predicting stroke recurrence and functional outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.