Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741784›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Prehabilitation beyond the trimodal standard: occupational therapy in a quadrimodal cancer care model.

Tomáš Brtnický, Markéta Polková, Marie Tichá, Peter Koliba, Oľga Dubová, Michal Zikán, Alena Jarolímková, Petr Hubka, Pavel Kabele, Jana Matějíčková and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tomáš BrtnickýDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. tomas.brtnicky@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-1903
Markéta PolkováDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4581-1994
Marie TicháDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Bulovka University Hospital, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3734-355X
Peter KolibaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-0145
Oľga DubováDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7185-550X
Michal ZikánDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-8895
Alena JarolímkováDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr HubkaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-8690
Pavel KabeleDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7295-3954
Jana MatějíčkováDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charles University - 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0464-9273
Petra OvesnáInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-5896
Petra SládkováDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Bulovka University Hospital, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-8154

Funding

Bulovka University Hospital grant nr. 24-IGS02-36 (FNBul 00064211)Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic grant no. NU21-03-00014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrehabilitation is an increasingly recognised strategy designed to optimise patients' physical, nutritional, and psychological status before major surgery. While the benefits of trimodal prehabilitation have been documented, we developed and implemented a quadrimodal model that incorporates occupational therapy as a fourth component. This comprehensive intervention targets frail patients with advanced oncogynecologic disease, a population at high risk for postoperative complications. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study recruited 40 patients, 32 of whom successfully completed an intensive 3-week prehabilitation programme. The programme comprised four modules: physiotherapy, nutritional support, psychological support, and occupational therapy. Patients completed 4 days of inpatient care and 3 days of home care per week. The effectiveness of the programme was assessed using a range of methods, including physical tests (6-min walk test, 5 × sit-to-stand test), psychological status questionnaires (perceived stress scale) and nutritional assessment using established questionnaires (MUST and PONS).

resultsThe results demonstrated statistically significant enhancements in physical fitness assessments, a decline in the frailty index, and an augmentation in psychological well-being. Notably, three patients no longer fulfilled the frailty criteria at the conclusion of the programme. Spirometric parameters, including FVC, FEV1, and PEF, exhibited substantial improvement. The nutritional intervention resulted in a reduction in the number of patients at high risk of malnutrition. Additionally, there was a notable improvement in the nutritional parameters.

conclusionThis quadrimodal prehabilitation model, integrating occupational therapy, demonstrated effectiveness in preparing frail oncologic patients for radical surgery. The approach not only improved physical and psychological readiness but also allowed for patient stratification into responders and non-responders. Its implementation in clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes and reduce the burden of postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

Cancer surgeryFrailtyMultimodal interventionOccupational therapyPhysiotherapyPrehabilitationSupportive oncology

Identifiers

PMID41741784
PMCPMC12935726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.