ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Learning curve for robot-assisted rectal resection using the hinotori™ surgical robot system: a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis in a surgical team without prior robotic surgery experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends in robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a bibliometric and science-mapping analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning curves for robot-assisted rectal resection are mainly reported for the da Vinci platform. We evaluated the learning curve and short-term outcomes after introducing the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System as the first robotic platform for a surgeon with no prior console experience and a team with no prior robotic surgery experience. We retrospectively analyzed 60 consecutive robot-assisted rectal resections performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System at a single center. The primary and secondary outcomes were the console time and robot roll-in–to–console start time, respectively. The case mix was adjusted using the Veenhof technical difficulty score and procedure type, and the change point was identified using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. The RA-CUSUM curve peaked at case 27, defining the learning (cases 1–27) and stable (cases 28–60) phases. The median console time decreased from 198 min (interquartile range, 137–251) to 156 min (112–193) (p = 0.014) despite increased technical difficulty (median Veenhof score, 12 [9–16] vs. 17 [11–22]; p = 0.040). The median robot roll-in–to–console start time was 9 (8–12) and 9 (7–11) min in the learning and stable phases, respectively (p = 0.817). No surgery was converted to open surgery. In addition, postoperative and key pathological outcomes were comparable between phases. In this first robotic platform setting, our case-mix–adjusted analysis suggested that the console time stabilized after 27 cases. The robot roll-in–to–console start time remained stable throughout, suggesting early standardization of the pre-console workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.