ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
The Orgasmometer-m: validation in Mandarin and measurement of orgasmic intensity in the Han population affected by premature ejaculation.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Response to comment on: Pre-spermatorrhea state: a novel therapeutic paradigm for the management of non-organic delayed ejaculation and anejaculation.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study aimed to validate the male version of the Orgasmometer in Mandarin and to examine whether Chinese men with premature ejaculation (PE) experience reduced orgasmic intensity. From September 2020 to January 2023, a group of 230 men with PE (mean age=28.2 ± 4.8) and 107 men without sexual dysfunction (mean age= 35.1 ± 6.7), who were seeking help from the Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine, underwent a detailed assessment from the andrologist and completed a questionnaire that included the Mandarin Orgasmometer (Orgasmometer-m), the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), and the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6). Orgasmometer-m scores were 5.0 (4.0) in the PE group and 8.0 (3.0) in the non-PE group; PEDT scores were 14.8 ± 2.5 and 3.3 ± 2.4, and IIEF-6 scores were 27.9 ± 1.6 and 29.1 ± 1.2, respectively (p < 0.001). The Orgasmometer demonstrated good discriminative validity, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8296 (95% CI: 0.7873-0.8719, p < 0.0001). A score of ≤6 was identified as the optimal cutoff for distinguishing low from high orgasm intensity, yielding 66.1% sensitivity and 86.9% specificity. These findings support the reliability of the Orgasmometer-m and suggest that men with PE report diminished orgasmic experiences.
Identifiers
41741760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.