ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Pain spectrum in immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events: evolution, characteristics and management challenges based on bibliometrics.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment, driving increased research into immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including pain. ICI-induced pain differs from traditional cancer pain or pain caused by chemotherapy or radiotherapy in its mechanisms, manifestations, and management. It often necessitates ICI dose reduction, potentially compromising efficacy, and requires careful balancing of immunosuppression and analgesia. Although glucocorticoids are first line for inflammatory pain, their long-term or high-dose use can attenuate ICI effectiveness, increase infection risk, and lead to pain recurrence after withdrawal-making "steroid-sparing strategies" a central clinical challenge. However, bibliometric studies in this area remain scarce. This analysis of 484 publications examines research trends, advances, characteristics, and management challenges of the pain spectrum in ICI-related irAEs.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), yielding 484 relevant papers. Visualization and analysis were conducted using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, citation relationships, and citation burst detection were analyzed to identify research structures and current focal points.
resultsOncology forms the core discipline, with U.S. institutions playing a leading role. International collaboration is vital for advancing the field. Current research focuses on characterizing pain phenotypes across different ICIs and elucidating their potential immunological mechanisms. A major clinical challenge lies in early identification and differentiation of ICI-related pain from tumor- or treatment-related pain. Equally important is balancing rapid irAE control with avoiding the negative impact of prolonged steroid use on pain outcomes. Developing "steroid-sparing strategies" and establishing predictive biomarker systems are essential for achieving precision pain management.
conclusionThis bibliometric study maps the knowledge landscape and developmental trends of pain in ICI-related adverse events, underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration, and highlights future directions for overcoming clinical challenges and advancing individualized, precision-based treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.