ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
What is the Journey to Physiotherapy Care for Women over 60 Years with Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Scoping Review.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) impacts 20% of adult women with prevalence increasing with age. Physiotherapy is considered first-line care and can greatly improve quality of life for those experiencing symptoms. However, few women over 60 seek professional help. Little is known regarding how this population receives care for their PFD, including if, and when, they are referred to physiotherapy. The aim of this study is to review the current literature on the journey of women over 60 years with PFD to accessing physiotherapy.
methodsA search of electronic databases was completed to inform the scoping review. Articles were included if they were in English and analysed the journey to physiotherapy for women 60 years or over with PFD. Analysis of the studies were completed by reviewers and organised into key themes.
resultsFour articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Four themes were identified: the General Practitioner (GP) as gatekeepers to pelvic care, timely initiation of physiotherapy care, bias towards passive care for women over 60 with PFD and lack of awareness around the benefits of physiotherapy for PFD in women over 60.
conclusionsGiven the limited literature found on this topic it is difficult to draw conclusions about the current pathway to physiotherapy for women over 60 years with PFD. However, the available literature suggests this population is less likely to be referred to physiotherapy and more likely to be prescribed passive care, which differs from international guideline recommendations and younger age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.