ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
RAS blockade in chronic kidney disease: Current evidence and future directions.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global public health issue. The primary causes include diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and glomerular diseases, which involve different pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms, but lead to similar outcomes. In this review, the authors examine the role of pharmacological agents that modify the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in patients with renal diseases and significant proteinuria. The use of these agents can lead to a reduction in albuminuria and proteinuria, stabilize renal function during follow-up, and slow the progression of the disease. Clinical evidence supports the biological rationale that inhibiting the RAS reduces intraglomerular pressure and mitigates ongoing renal damage. This also underscores the importance of optimal dosing, careful monitoring of electrolytes, and attention to comorbidities to maximize therapeutic benefits in real-world clinical practice, while highlighting the need for further research to refine patient selection and long-term management strategies within an evolving, combination-based therapeutic paradigm. In the contemporary therapeutic landscape, RAS blockade should be viewed as a foundational therapy, primarily driven by cardiovascular protection and proteinuria reduction, upon which newer disease-modifying agents-such as SGLT2 inhibitors-are built. In the contemporary therapeutic landscape, RAS blockade is re-evaluated as a foundational therapy, primarily driven by cardiovascular protection and proteinuria reduction, upon which newer disease-modifying agents-most notably SGLT2 inhibitors-are layered. Future strategies should focus on optimized combination therapy, careful patient selection, and integration of emerging pharmacological pathways to maximize nephroprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41741732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.