Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741659›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Functional bipartite invariance in mouse primary visual cortex receptive fields.

Zhiwei Ding, Dat Tran, Kayla Ponder, Zhuokun Ding, Rachel Froebe, Lydia Ntanavara, Paul G Fahey, Erick Cobos, Luca Baroni, Maria Diamantaki and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Zhiwei Ding *Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Dat Tran *Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kayla PonderCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhuokun DingCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-5182
Rachel FroebeCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0260-9036
Lydia NtanavaraCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9158-8408
Paul G FaheyCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Erick CobosCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Luca BaroniFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-7615
Maria DiamantakiInstitute of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Foundation of Research & Technology - Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-7628
Eric Y WangCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1084-7059
Andersen ChangCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Stelios PapadopoulosCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jiakun FuCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Taliah MuhammadCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Christos PapadopoulosCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0669-7968
Santiago A CadenaInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7508-4443
Alexandros EvangelouInstitute of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Foundation of Research & Technology - Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.
Konstantin WillekeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Fabio AnselmiDepartment of Mathematics, Informatics and Geoscience, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Sophia SanbornDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1957-7067
Jan AntolikFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7223-4426
Emmanouil FroudarakisInstitute of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Foundation of Research & Technology - Hellas, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3249-3845
Saumil PatelCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-8940
Edgar Y WalkerDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jacob ReimerCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-8846
Fabian H SinzCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-9736
Alexander S EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-5105
Katrin FrankeCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Xaq PitkowCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-329X
Andreas S ToliasCenter for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. tolias@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-6376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems support generalization by representing features that persist under input variation; however, identifying the neuronal basis of these invariances remains difficult due to high-dimensional and nonlinear neural computations. Here we leverage the inception loop paradigm, iterating between large-scale recordings, predictive models and in silico experiments with in vivo verification, to characterize neuronal invariances in mouse primary visual cortex (V1). We synthesize varied exciting inputs (VEIs), dissimilar images that drive target neurons. These VEIs revealed a new bipartite invariance: one subfield encodes a shift-tolerant high-frequency texture and the other encodes a fixed low-frequency pattern. This division aligns with object boundaries defined by spatial frequency differences in highly activating images, suggesting a contribution to segmentation. Analysis of the MICrONS dataset revealed a hierarchy of excitatory neurons in mouse V1 layers 2/3: postsynaptic neurons exhibited greater invariance than their presynaptic inputs, while neurons with lower invariance formed more connections. Together, these results provide insights and scalable methodology for mapping neuronal invariances.

Indexed as

NeuronsPrimary Visual CortexVisual CortexVisual FieldsAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID41741659
PMCPMC13061618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.