ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep residual and hybrid CNN models for confidence-aware real-world waste classification for sustainable waste management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient waste classification is crucial for promoting recycling and achieving sustainable waste management. Real-world waste streams, however, often include mixed, deformed, and contaminated items, making manual sorting inefficient and error prone. A deep learning-based system for multi-class classification of heterogeneous waste using the RealWaste dataset is presented in this paper, which reflects actual disposal conditions such as cluttered backgrounds and overlapping materials. We fine-tune and evaluate several convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including InceptionV3, ResNet101, DenseNet, VGG, EfficientNet, and MobileNet. Among these, ResNet101 demonstrated the best performance, achieving a validation accuracy of 98.86%, loss of 0.0379, and 0.99 as F1 score. We also introduce hybrid models (e.g., ResNet101 + InceptionV3), which improved precision in complex categories such as textiles and miscellaneous trash. Furthermore, a confidence score evaluation strategy is proposed to assess model reliability, revealing high confidence (≥ 0.95) for visually distinct classes like vegetation, plastic, and food organics. Our findings establish a robust and scalable benchmark for deploying intelligent waste classification systems in real-world, sustainability-driven environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.