ArticleScientific reports2026
Cardiac synchrony, peer relationships, and affective experiences in children during group interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-wavelet analysis allows obtaining high temporal and frequency resolution in heart rate synchrony analysis.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study focused on the affective and physiological processes that may emerge during children’s dyadic peer interactions in groups. We hypothesized that physiological synchrony, the correspondence of physiological processes between individuals, would be associated with both the quality of the relationship and children’s individual and shared affective experiences. We tested this hypothesis in our sample of 187 children (mean age = 11.32, SD = 0.69), who arrived at the laboratory in groups of 4 to 6 individuals from the same classroom. During their interactions, we assessed all pairwise combinations within each group, resulting in 243 dyads with complete data. Before and after the group interaction, participants reported on their pre-established dyadic relationship quality with each group member (liking, closeness, and friendship), and reflected on their individual and shared affective experiences before the experiment and their affective experiences throughout the experiment using an Affect Grid measure. Participants listened to and discussed a story about the social exclusion of a peer. Heart rate was measured throughout the experiment using a one-channel ECG, and synchrony was calculated for each dyad using high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) cross-wavelet power. The results indicated increased LF synchrony in friends compared to non-friends. In contrast, dyads showed reduced HF synchrony when experiencing more positive affect. Exploratory results further suggested that synchrony may vary depending on different types of affective experiences for friends and non-friends. We discuss how physiological processes may be informative about the quality of short-term interactions and friendship patterns during peer group dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.