ArticleScientific reports2026
Wheat yield prediction using integrated optical and radar remote sensing with machine learning across key phenological stages.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI driven multi modal deep learning system for wheat disease detection, yield prediction, and crop health monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise and timely prediction of wheat yield is pivotal for ensuring global food security and optimizing agricultural management practices, particularly through advanced remote sensing and machine learning techniques. In this study, wheat yield was accurately estimated by leveraging remote sensing-derived soil and vegetation indices. Yield data from 189 study points were collected, and Sentinel-2 (10-meter resolution) imagery from the Tillering and Anthesis growth stages was used. The models incorporated 25 variables, including 16 optical indices (e.g., NDVI, SAVI, MSAVI2) and three topographic factors. The key novelty of this research is the rigorous comparison of the predictive value and synergistic contribution of Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data when integrated with Sentinel-2 optical indices within machine learning frameworks. Three machine learning approaches (Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF)) were employed and evaluated using 70% training and 30% testing subsets. Results revealed that the RF model, leveraging data from the Anthesis phenological stage, exhibited superior performance in wheat yield estimation, achieving an R² of 0.92 and an RMSE of 0.14 ton ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.