ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of antibiotic type and timing with sepsis mortality using target trial emulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Impact of an Emergency Triage Nursing Strategy on Early Recognition and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Pre-Post Case-Note Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibiotic therapy is essential for sepsis management, but the optimal empirical strategy remains uncertain. This study evaluated the effects of first-line antibiotic preference and initiation timing on in-hospital mortality among intensive care units (ICU) patients with sepsis. Using the MIMIC-IV database, we emulated a sequential target trial comparing patients who received antibiotics within 48 h of sepsis diagnosis versus delayed initiation. Randomization was approximated through a clone-censor-weight process to address confounding by indication. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Weighted Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs), and sensitivity analyses tested robustness. Among 3,669 eligible patients, 3,568 (97%) received antibiotics within 48 h. After weighting, covariate balance was achieved. Beta-lactam use was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.95), with consistent reductions at 7, 14, and 60 days. Timing within the 48-hour window did not modify outcomes for either beta-lactams or glycopeptides. Empirical beta-lactam therapy was linked to improved survival among ICU sepsis patients, whereas timing of initiation showed no significant impact. These findings support prioritizing beta-lactam-based regimens as first-line empirical coverage in early sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.