Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741588›Full record

ArticleNpj mental health research2026

A systematic review of higher education-based interventions to support the mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students.

Faith Ross, Eleanor J Dommett, Nicola Byrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Npj mental health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faith RossDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK. faith.ross@kcl.ac.uk.
Eleanor J DommettDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.
Nicola ByromDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing numbers of neurodivergent students are engaging in higher education; however, support approaches vary within different institutions. Sometimes there are long waiting lists for specialised support, and most focus on academic adjustments, such as providing extra time in an assessment, rather than mental health and wellbeing. A systematic review, pre-registered on Prospero (CRD42024597980), was conducted to provide an overview of interventions supporting mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students in higher education. Ovid, Web of Science, and ERIC databases were searched in May 2025. Studies were included where the intervention aimed to improve mental health and/or wellbeing or improve the student experience, and the focus was on whether any strength-based approaches were used. Thirty-seven studies are included, conducted in seven countries. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included papers. Interventions varied widely and included: coaching, cognitive behavioural therapy, self-help, peer support, psychotherapy, counselling, mentoring, mindfulness, and neuro/bio feedback. The narrative synthesis demonstrates little evidence of strength-based approaches and found that neurodivergent students were rarely involved in designing the interventions. Most commonly, studies focused on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (17 studies) or Autism (14 studies), with few interventions considering co-occurrence or other neurotypes.

Identifiers

PMID41741588
PMCPMC12936057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.