ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning approaches to predict the risk of tuberculosis among household contacts of index TB patients in Central Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) transmission within households remains a significant challenge in Ethiopia. Various factors including household, index TB case and contact characteristics may have a role in its transmission. Predicting which contacts of TB patients are at greatest risk of developing TB could help focus screening and intervention efforts on early detection and treatment initiation. In this study, we employed various machine learning models to predict TB risk among household contacts. We used data from a cross-sectional study of household contacts of index TB patients in Central Ethiopia. Data were collected through household visits conducted by trained health workers as part of a community-based TB contact investigation program in Central Ethiopia. A set of individual, household, and index case variables were used to train and evaluate multiple supervised machine learning models. Models included Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and XGBoost classifiers. Model performance was assessed using recall, precision, accuracy, ROC-AUC, and F1-score with recall (sensitivity) being prioritized because of the existence of class imbalance. Among 1,277 household contacts screened, 23 (1.8%) were diagnosed with TB. Random Forest and Balanced Random Forest classifiers outperformed logistic regression, achieving recall scores of 0.85. Logistic regression, a commonly used classifier, had an accuracy of 0.92 but a modest recall of 0.43 and an AUC of 0.76. Important TB predictors among household contacts identified using the best performing Balanced Random Forest model included being a presumptive TB case at baseline, providing sputum, having a cough and a productive cough, fatigue and loss of appetite. Machine learning models can identify household contacts at high risk for TB using routinely collected contact investigation data. Integration of predictive modeling into contact investigation could support more targeted and efficient TB screening efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.