Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A surrogate-based inverse design framework for targeted diameter control of electrospun nanofibers.

Mehrab Mahdian, Ferenc Ender, Tamas Pardy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehrab MahdianThomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616, Tallinn, Estonia. mehrab.mahdian@taltech.ee.
Ferenc EnderBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Electron Devices, Budapest, 1111, Hungary.
Tamas PardyThomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616, Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur,Estonia PSG897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospinning is a high-throughput technique for producing nanofibers. The diameter of such nanofibers governs key properties such as surface area, porosity, and mechanical strength. Precise diameter control is therefore crucial for applications from filtration to tissue engineering, yet optimizing processing conditions for targeted diameter fabrication typically relies on slow, costly trial-and-error experiments. This study presents a data-driven inverse-design framework that replaces traditional trial-and-error optimization with predictive modeling to achieve precise diameter control. Eleven regression models were evaluated on a dataset of 96 poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) experiments, with Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) emerging as the best surrogate (test [Formula: see text]). SHAP analysis confirmed applied voltage and solution concentration as the most influential parameters, consistent with physical principles. In the optimization stage, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) achieved the highest inverse design accuracy ([Formula: see text], MAE [Formula: see text]). This framework enables rapid, efficient design of nanofibers with specified properties and is readily adaptable to other materials and fabrication processes.

Indexed as

ElectrospinningInverse designNanofibersOptimization

Identifiers

PMID41741558
PMCPMC13043720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.