ArticleScientific data2026
A Dataset for Addressing Patient's Information Needs related to Clinical Course of Hospitalization.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated evaluation can distinguish the good and bad AI responses to patient questions about hospitalization.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient's unique information needs about their hospitalization can be addressed using clinical evidence from electronic health records (EHRs) and artificial intelligence (AI). However, robust datasets to assess the factuality and relevance of AI-generated responses are lacking and, to our knowledge, none capture patient information needs in the context of their EHRs. To address this gap, we introduce ArchEHR-QA, an expert-annotated dataset of 134 cases from intensive care unit and emergency department settings. Cases comprise patient questions from public health forums, clinician-interpreted versions, relevant clinical note excerpts with sentence-level relevance annotations, and clinician-authored answers. To establish benchmarks for grounded EHR question answering (QA), we evaluated three open-weight large language models (Llama 4, Llama 3, and Mixtral) across three prompting strategies. We assessed performance on two dimensions: Factuality (overlap between cited and ground truth evidence) and Relevance (similarity to reference answers).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.