ArticleNature communications2026
Regional nonsense constraint offers biological and clinical insights into genetic disease.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliably predicting the molecular impact of premature termination codons (PTCs) is essential for the clinical interpretation of "loss-of-function" variants in human disease. Measures of selective constraint can identify genes and genomic regions which are intolerant to deleterious genetic variation. However, existing loss-of-function constraint metrics do not comprehensively account for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), a quality control pathway which critically regulates PTCs. Here, we use sequencing data from 730,947 individuals to develop an NMD-informed regional nonsense constraint metric. We find 2764 genes with significant regional nonsense constraint, including 641 known autosomal dominant disease genes. Using sequencing data in 32,260 trios from three rare disease cohorts, we find that de novo nonsense and frameshift variants are 9.5-fold enriched and associated with up to 5.9-fold higher odds of diagnosis in constrained regions versus unconstrained regions. We use these data to identify 22 candidate disease genes with clusters of de novo variants in constrained regions. These findings enhance clinical variant interpretation, deliver mechanistic insights in human disease, and empower the discovery of novel disease genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.