Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741453›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Developmental underpinnings of morphological disparity in the avian bony palate.

Olivia Plateau, Guillermo Navalón, Juan Benito, Daniel J Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivia PlateauDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. olivia.plateau@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8321-2687
Guillermo NavalónDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Juan BenitoDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-2058
Daniel J FieldDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. djf70@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bony palate of palaeognaths was long thought to retain the plesiomorphic condition for crown birds, but recent fossil evidence suggests that aspects of palaeognath palate morphology are derived from a neognath-like ancestral state. Relatedly, heterochronic shifts have been proposed as the mechanism underpinning major evolutionary transitions in avian palate morphology, but this hypothesis has never been explicitly tested with a broad phylogenetic assessment of morphological variation through avian ontogeny. Here, we assess palatal changes through post-hatching ontogeny across the major extant avian subclades and find that although palaeognaths exhibit distinct ontogenetic changes relative to neognaths, no signatures of heterochrony underlie these developmental differences. However, we find that important patterns of morphological change appear to be dictated by variation in developmental mode. Our results clarify the ontogenetic mechanisms driving avian palate disparity and illustrate the influence of developmental mode on the evolvability of a key morphofunctional system in the avian skull.

Indexed as

BirdsPalateAnimalsBiological EvolutionFossilsPhylogenySkull

Identifiers

PMID41741453
PMCPMC13111733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.