Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41741385›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026

Exploring the Learning Experiences of Non-Medical Prescribing Among Podiatry Students on Clinical Placement.

Stephanie Haines, Hamna M Khan, Sophia T Pano, Simon Otter, Kim Holmes, Kate Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie HainesDepartment of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, School of Health and Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0398-2487
Hamna M KhanDepartment of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, School of Health and Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6952-2587
Sophia T PanoDepartment of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, School of Health and Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6612-0166
Simon OtterHealth Sciences University, Parkwood Campus, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-1118
Kim HolmesDepartment of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, School of Health and Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Kate CarterDepartment of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, School of Health and Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-6199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndorsement for scheduled medicines has been available to Australian podiatrists for over a decade. However, uptake and prescribing rates remain low. A key barrier is the limited number of endorsed prescribers, which restricts access to mentorship opportunities for podiatrists seeking endorsement. While existing literature explores practicing podiatrists' perspectives on endorsement, the views of students regarding prescribing remain underrepresented. This study aimed to explore final-year podiatry students' experiences with non-medical prescribing during clinical placements.

methodsThis qualitative study purposively recruited final-year podiatry students from the University of Western Australia. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken to explore participants' experiences of non-medical prescribing during clinical placements, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using constant comparative analysis until data saturation was reached. Data recorded prior to interview included demographic information, academic characteristics were determined using self-reported questionnaires to describe motivation, self-efficacy and mental wellbeing and clinical logbook records were retrospectively reviewed for data on prescribing encounters recorded by students during clinical placements.

resultsFifteen participants aged between 23 and 46 years were recruited. Retrospective clinical logs showed that 631 of 7613 cases (8.3%) involved prescription of a scheduled medicine, with most prescribing opportunities occurring in public health settings. Six global themes relating to prescribing experiences emerged: limited exposure, confidence, learning experiences, proposed improvements, pursuit of endorsement and future career impacts. Relationships between themes were developed based on key concepts, particularly scarcity of endorsed prescribers, and limited amount and variety of prescribing encounters.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that although podiatry students experienced limited exposure to endorsed prescribing and low self-confidence in prescribing ability, they continued to see value in non-medical prescribing with a willingness to pursue endorsement in the future. Future implications to address limited student exposure to prescribing due to shortage of endorsed podiatrists may facilitate the uptake of endorsement for scheduled medicines.

Indexed as

clinical placementendorsement for scheduled medicinesnon‐medical prescribingpodiatry students

Identifiers

PMID41741385
PMCPMC12935556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.