ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Understanding the Brain as a Mentalizing Machine with a Symbol Grounding Function.
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Central Questions for Social Neuroscience Research.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social creatures can infer the mental states of others. This cognitive ability, called mentalizing, can be considered a process of inferring others' hidden states behind their actions from partially observable sensory information. The purpose of this review is to propose the computational mechanisms of mentalizing and review the neural substrates that might underlie each computational process. In fact, inference about hidden states is a ubiquitous task in many sensory systems, and this can be achieved under the predictive coding framework in which the brain probabilistically estimates a latent state that most likely causes the observed sensory events by minimizing errors between the actual and predicted sensory signals. We argue that what might be unique to mentalizing is not merely the representation of others' internal states in an arbitrary latent space but also the capacity to represent them in a mental space that one can experience subjectively. This function can solve the so-called symbol grounding problem. Further, the use of symbol grounding makes the inference system efficient and reliable by reducing the cost to learn de novo the latent representations of others' mental states. On the basis of a preliminary simulation, we demonstrate that an artificial mentalizing system with a symbol grounding function performs better in predicting the actions of virtual agents than a pure Bayesian observer without the symbol grounding function. Emerging novel paradigms integrating artificial and biological neural networks will enable a better understanding of the neural algorithms and computational processes for complex social cognition including mentalizing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.